The success rate of antegrade enemas for the management of idiopathic constipation.

PURPOSE: Most patients with idiopathic constipation achieve daily voluntary bowel movements with stimulant laxatives after a "Structured Bowel Management Program" (BMP). A small percentage require rectal enemas. One week in a BMP to find the right enema recipe results in a success rate great than 95%. Once the enema is radiologically and clinically effective, antegrade continent enema procedures (ACE) can afford patients an alternative route of enema administration. This study summarized the outcomes of children with idiopathic constipation who receive antegrade enemas (AE) with or without a prior BMP. METHODS: This was a single institution, retrospective cohort study of children with idiopathic constipation who underwent ACE procedures indicated by different providers from 2015-2020. We categorized the outcomes with AE after the ACE procedure as: "successful outcome" when the AE produced a daily bowel movement, no involuntary bowel movements, and no more fecal impactions, "unsuccessful outcome" was defined when the patient continued having involuntary bowel movements or fecal impaction requiring cleanouts despite a daily AE, and "unnecessary outcome" was defined when the patient was no longer doing AE, but had daily bowel movements, and no involuntary bowel movements or fecal impactions. RESULTS: Thirty-eight children with idiopathic constipation had an ACE. The most frequent indication for ACE was a failure of medical treatment. The most common medical treatment was polyethylene glycol. Before ACE, 34 (89%) patients did not have a BMP; 18 patients were on rectal enemas and 16 on laxatives. All four with BMP (100%) had a successful rectal enema. After ACE, 12 (31%) patients had successful antegrade enemas, including the four with previous successful BMP with rectal enemas. Twenty patients (52%) had unsuccessful antegrade enemas, and in 6 (15%), the ACE was unnecessary (Fig. 1). CONCLUSION: Using antegrade enemas without a previously successful formula for rectal enemas has resulted in a high rate of unsuccessful and unnecessary procedures. BMP for children with idiopathic constipation who needs rectal enemas offers a high possibility to find the proper rectal enema recipe and ensures higher rates of successful AE.

The effect of an enhanced recovery protocol in pediatric patients who undergo colostomy closure and Malone procedures.

PURPOSE: Pediatric colorectal studies have shown enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols can safely improve outcomes. This study sought to determine the impact of an ERAS pathway on the outcomes of children with colorectal conditions who underwent colostomy closure or Malone procedure. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of children who underwent colostomy closure or Malone procedure between 2016 and 2020 was performed. Differences in outcomes between pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts were tested. A sub-analysis based on procedure type was performed. RESULTS: There were 96 patients included: 22 prior to ERAS implementation and 74 after. Patients who underwent ERAS had shorter mean time (hours) to oral intake, mean days until regular diet, post-operative opioid volume, and median length of stay (p < 0.05). There was no difference in complication rates in the ERAS and pre-ERAS cohort (12.2 vs 9.1%, p = 0.99). Patients who underwent colostomy closure after ERAS had lower post-operative opioid use, but no differences were seen in those who underwent Malone. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ERAS protocol resulted in quicker time to oral intake, normal diet, and decreased opioid use without increasing complication rates. Differences seen based on procedure type may reflect that the effect of an ERAS protocol is procedure specific.

The importance of dedicated colorectal team participation in the management of spina bifida and spinal cord injury patients.

PURPOSE: In September 2020, the colorectal team of the International Center for Colorectal and Urogenital Care joined the spina bifida and spinal cord injury multidisciplinary clinic at Children's Hospital Colorado. Many important lessons were learned. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients seen in the spina bifida and spinal cord injury multidisciplinary clinic from September 2020 to May 2021 was conducted. Data collected included demographics, diagnosis, pre or post-natal repair for those with myelomeningocele, whether the patient was previously seen by the colorectal team, wheelchair usage, voluntary bowel control vs. fecal incontinence, urinary control vs. clean intermittent catheterization, characteristics of contrast enema, and our proposed intervention. RESULTS: Overall, 189 children were seen during the study period, ranging from 3 months to 20 years of age (average = 9.5 years). One hundred and two were males and 87 were females. Diagnosis included myelomeningocele (n = 153), spinal cord injury (n = 18), transverse myelitis (n = 7), sacral agenesis (n = 5), diastematomyelia (n = 2), spinal stenosis (n = 2), and tethered cord with lipoma (n = 2). Fifteen patients with myelomeningocele were repaired in-utero. One hundred and sixty patients were new to the colorectal team. Eighty-one patients were wheelchair users. One hundred and twenty-three patients suffered from fecal incontinence and needed enemas to be artificially clean for stool and thirty-eight patients had voluntary bowel movements and were clean with laxatives, suppository, or rectal stimulations. Twenty-eight patients were younger than three years of age and still in diapers. Despite a non-dilated colon on contrast enema, this population has a hypomotile colon. One hundred and twenty-eight patients required clean intermittent catheterization. CONCLUSION: Joining the spina bifida and spinal cord injury multidisciplinary clinic allowed us to better serve this population and gave us enormous satisfaction to contribute to improve the quality of life of the patients and their parents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Considering the value of online support groups for colorectal conditions: perspectives from caregivers and adult patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the benefits of participating in an online support group for caregivers of children with a colorectal condition or adult patients with a similar condition. METHODS: An electronic survey was administered to members of an international online support group (18 items for caregivers; 15 for patients). Items included demographics, medical diagnosis, potential benefits, and overall experiences in the group. Quantitative results were summarized as descriptive trends, while qualitative responses were summarized thematically. RESULTS: Respondents (102 caregivers, 6 patients) were primarily female, 35-44 years old, Caucasian, and resided in the United States. Most respondents learned about the support group from medical providers or online search. Cited benefits included learning information, gaining support, forming connections through shared experience, and utilizing a unique resource. Being a member of the group was helpful to respondents, improved their mental health and access to health information, and they would recommend the group to others. CONCLUSION: Participation in online support groups offers educational and emotional benefits to patients/caregivers which complements the medical support from their colorectal teams. Thus, colorectal providers need to be aware of the availability and potential benefits of these groups, and encourage their patients/caregivers to be actively involved.

A review of adopted colorectal patients: a parent's perspective.

PURPOSE: After treating many adopted patients with congenital colorectal conditions, our goal was to understand if parents were properly counseled about their child's medical needs before adoption. METHODS: A comprehensive questionnaire was developed. Recruitment occurred by social media and colorectal database. RESULTS: 48 parents participated. Adopted children were primarily male (60%), internationally adopted (75%), and a median age of 2.5 years (range newborn-13yo). While 96% of parents received medical records, 41% had incorrect/missing information. Most patients had an anorectal malformation (83%, Table 1), and a third had the primary pull-through prior to adoption (16). Nearly all required a surgical procedure after adoption (87%), including a redo pull-through (19%). Children were frequently incontinent of stool (83%) and urine (46%). In some families, the medical condition negatively affected the relationship between the parent and adopted child (12.5%), parent and other siblings (40.5%), and adopted child and other siblings (19%). 58% of parents state managing their child's medical condition was more difficult than anticipated. Family, friends, and the medical team was noted as the most helpful support systems. Table 1 Colorectal diagnoses Diagnosis Number of Participants Percentage (%) ARM (Unknown) 11 23 Cloaca 8 17 Cloacal Exstrophy 4 8 ARM No Fistula 3 6 Rectobulbar Fistula 3 6 Rectovestibular Fistula 3 6 Hirschsprung's Disease 3 6 Rectoprostatic Fistula 2 4 Spina Bifida 2 4 Rectoperineal Fistula 1 2 Rectovaginal Fistula 1 2 Rectobladderneck Fistula 1 2 Complex Malformation 1 2 Rectal Atresia 1 2 Rectal Stenosis 1 2 Idiopathic Constipation 1 2 Sacral Agenesis 1 2 Sacrococcygeal Teratoma 1 2 CONCLUSION: We strongly recommend putting support systems in place, obtaining as much medical information as possible, preparing for possible lifelong management, and consulting with a specialized colorectal team before adoption.

An overview of opioid usage and regional anesthesia for patients undergoing repair of anorectal malformation.

PURPOSE: The recent opioid crisis in the USA compelled us to evaluate our practice of opioid use for postoperative pain management and the influence of regional anesthesia on opioid requirement in patients undergoing repair of anorectal malformations. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed evaluating patients who underwent posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) and posterior sagittal anorecto-vagino-urethroplasty (PSARVUP), with or without laparotomy, between January 2016 and March 2020. Morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram (MME/kg) were calculated. IRB approval was obtained for this study. RESULTS: A total of 105 surgical patients had either a PSARP (74 without laparotomy, 10 with laparotomy) or PSARVUP (13 without laparotomy, 8 with laparotomy). Regional anesthesia included epidurals, transversus abdominis plane block, caudal block or paravertebral catheters. Of the PSARP patients, 4 without laparotomy and 7 with laparotomy received regional anesthesia. For PSARVUP with laparotomy, 4/8 received regional. 44% of PSARP patients without laparotomy did not require opioids postoperatively. The MME/kg required exponentially increased for patients over the age of 5 who underwent PSARP. CONCLUSIONS: Regional anesthesia is a useful modality for pain control for PSARP/PSARVUP with laparotomy, decreasing the opioid usage, but it is unnecessary for the already low opioid requirements, in patients younger than 5 years of age, without laparotomy.

Analysis of patients' and caregivers' psychosocial functioning in colorectal conditions: comparison of diagnosis, gender, and developmental functioning.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the psychosocial functioning of caregivers and patients with anorectal malformation (ARM), Hirschsprung disease (HD), spinal conditions, and idiopathic constipation (IC) during the beginning of participation in bowel management program (BMP). METHODS: In this retrospective study, Parent Stress Scale (PSS, parent-report) and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ, parent-proxy; SDQ-S, self-report for 11 years and older) were used to evaluate parental stress levels and behavioral functioning, respectively. Descriptive and comparative statistical approaches were applied to summarize the data and to determine differences in scores between diagnoses, gender, and developmental functioning. RESULTS: Two hundred patients and caregivers participated in BMP during the study period. PSS scores were significantly higher for caregivers of patients with IC than ARM. Statistical differences in SDQ were found for patients with IC versus those with ARM, male versus female patients, and patients with developmental delays versus those without delays. No significant differences were found in SDQ-S scores between these groups. CONCLUSION: Key findings suggest that level of parental stress and behavioral concerns were significantly influenced by diagnoses, and partly by gender and presence of developmental delay. Thus, psychosocial support may need to be tailored based on these findings to provide optimum quality of care for patients and families.

Bowel management program in patients with spina bifida.

PURPOSE: Our center has been successfully implementing a bowel management program (BMP) for fecal incontinence consecutive to anorectal malformation and Hirschsprung disease. Recently, the number of patients with spina bifida requiring management for fecal incontinence has increased. The purpose of this study was to review the results of bowel management in patients with spina bifida and the challenges unique to this population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed including all patients with spina bifida who attended our BMP from February 2016 until April 2018. Data collection included: prenatal intervention, gender, age, characteristics of contrast enema, success rateand challenges faced. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria 13 of which were females. Three patients had their myelomeningocele repaired prenatally, the remaining were repaired postnatally. Patient ages ranged from 2 to 24 years. Only nine patients were referred to BMP at proper toilet training age. Three patients came to BMP status post an antegrade enema procedure with reported "accidents" on their current regimen. The colon in the contrast enema was non-dilated in all patients and two behaved as hypermotile requiring loperamide. Seventeen patients (77%) were clean of stool and considered successful. Solution leakage during enema administration was the most common challenge and was corrected by increasing the Foley balloon fill volume. CONCLUSIONS: Our bowel management program with enemas is effective for patients with a history of spina bifida. The data support specific considerations for this population including frequent adjustments, close follow-up and specific administration techniques.